The team's presentation and report were highly professional, demonstrating a clear and thorough understanding of the project. The problem definition was succinctly stated and effectively linked to supporting evidence, providing a strong foundation for the proposed solution. The requirements alignment was exceptional. The solution was explicitly and logically mapped to each requirement from the brief, showing a meticulous attention to detail and ensuring all objectives were met. The method and logic were sound, feasible, and well-justified, indicating a robust and thoughtful approach to the project's challenges. The quality of the research was evident through the use of strong evidence and sources. All claims were backed by credible data or citations, which significantly strengthened the credibility of their findings and recommendations. The practicality of their recommendations was a notable highlight. They were actionable and included clear owners, timelines, and costs, making the path forward easy to understand and implement. The team also demonstrated foresight in risk handling, as key risks were clearly identified, and practical mitigations were proposed. The overall clarity and structure of the report were excellent, featuring a concise executive summary, clear headings, and effective signposting that made the document easy to navigate. The team contribution was transparently outlined, with roles and inputs clearly acknowledged, which speaks to the collaborative nature of the group. Lastly, the presentation quality was outstanding. The slides were readable, not text-dense, and the visuals added significant value, helping to communicate complex information effectively. All formalities, including references and appendices, were handled correctly, adhering to the brief's requirements. Overall, this was a highly commendable effort that exceeded expectations across all assessed criteria.